01881nmm a22002537a 4500003000900000005001700009008004100026022001400067040002800081245008900109260003100198300001600229500013400245501029600379520069800675653002101373653001101394653001401405700004501419700002801464700003001492700003201522856007301554ES-BaAUN20230203095049.0221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  a2575-5374  aES-BaAUNbengcES-BaAUN11aBiophilic Design Applications: Psychological and Physiological Health and Well-being3 burbanNext,cJuly 18, 2018.  a2190 words.  aDavid Jones, Energy and sustainability, Essay, expanding design practices, Josh Zeunert, No Density, Paul Downton, Phillip Roös  aArchitecture&nature, Biological structures, Cities, Comfort, Comfortable environment, Cultural agitator, Design, Design strategies, Designer’s role, Developing policies, Environment, Essay, Health, Nature, Psychological Well-being, Urban Health, Urban sensibility, Urbanisation, Vegetation  aIn 1984 E.O. Wilson (1984) introduced and popularized the Biophilia hypothesis defining biophilia as “the urge to affiliate with other forms of life” (Kellert & Wilson 1995: 416). Wilson’s biophilia hypothesis suggests that there is an instinctive bond between human beings and other living systems. More recently, in the USA, Browning et al. (2014) have proposed ‘14 Patterns of Biophilic Design’ within a framework for linking the human biological sciences and nature to built environment design offering a series of tools for enriching design opportunities, and avenues for design applications as a way to effectively enhance the health and well-being of individuals and society. 00aBiophilic Design00aHealth05aAustralia1 aJones, David L. eauthor.q(David Lloyd)1 aZeunert, Josh eauthor.1 aDownton, Paul F.eauthor.1 aRoös, Phillip B.eauthor.40uhttps://urbannext.net/biophilic-design-applications/zAccess to info