000			02097nmm a22002657a 4500
003			ES-BaAUN
005			20230117090535.0
008			221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2575-5374
040			_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN
100	1		_aSheppard, Lola _eauthor _d1972-
245	1	0	_aEnvironment-Webs
260	3		_burbanNext, _cJanuary 19, 2018.
300			_a3381 words.
500			_aBracket 3 [at extremes], Essay, Lola Sheppard, Senseable Technologies, Technology and fabrication, Urban Paradigms
501			_aArchitecture’s challenge, Biological technologies, Built landscape, California, Challenge, Design, Designing Climate, Ecological activation, Ecological footprint, Ecological urbanism, Ecology, Emerging ecology, Essay, Evolutionary ecology, Hybridization, Interdisciplinary design, New Statements on Nature, Thermodynamic theories, Thermodynamics, Timeless Model, Urban exploration, Urban Paradigms
504			_aExcerpt from Bracket 3 [at extremes] -- https://actar.com/product/bracket-3/
504			_aCheck Bracket Organization -- https://brkt.org/
520			_aArchitecture has recently renewed its fascination with the notion of environment, as a dynamic and an atmospherically tangible space of design. This has been driven by a number of trajectories and positions within the discipline. On the one hand, the ever-expanding discourse on sustainability has brought debates of technology-driven versus passive means of control to the fore. On the other hand, architecture has embraced responsive design anew, testing the possibility of environments that contain instruments for sensing and responding to atmospheric conditions and human occupants. Simultaneously, responsive design has sought out biological and ecological models, embracing the notion of architecture an as organism able to physically react to changing interior and exterior environmental conditions.
653	0	0	_aTechnology
653	0	0	_aResponsive Architecture
653	0	0	_aEnvironment
856	4	0	_uhttps://urbannext.net/environment-webs/ _zAccess to info
942			_2ddc _cCF _n0
999			_c1607 _d1607