000			01933nmm a22002777a 4500
003			ES-BaAUN
005			20230203095049.0
008			221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2575-5374
040			_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN
245	1	1	_aBiophilic Design Applications: Psychological and Physiological Health and Well-being
260	3		_burbanNext, _cJuly 18, 2018.
300			_a2190 words.
500			_aDavid Jones, Energy and sustainability, Essay, expanding design practices, Josh Zeunert, No Density, Paul Downton, Phillip Roös
501			_aArchitecture&nature, Biological structures, Cities, Comfort, Comfortable environment, Cultural agitator, Design, Design strategies, Designer’s role, Developing policies, Environment, Essay, Health, Nature, Psychological Well-being, Urban Health, Urban sensibility, Urbanisation, Vegetation
520			_aIn 1984 E.O. Wilson (1984) introduced and popularized the Biophilia hypothesis defining biophilia as “the urge to affiliate with other forms of life” (Kellert & Wilson 1995: 416). Wilson’s biophilia hypothesis suggests that there is an instinctive bond between human beings and other living systems. More recently, in the USA, Browning et al. (2014) have proposed ‘14 Patterns of Biophilic Design’ within a framework for linking the human biological sciences and nature to built environment design offering a series of tools for enriching design opportunities, and avenues for design applications as a way to effectively enhance the health and well-being of individuals and society.
653	0	0	_aBiophilic Design
653	0	0	_aHealth
653	0	5	_aAustralia
700	1		_aJones, David L. _eauthor. _q(David Lloyd)
700	1		_aZeunert, Josh _eauthor.
700	1		_aDownton, Paul F. _eauthor.
700	1		_aRoös, Phillip B. _eauthor.
856	4	0	_uhttps://urbannext.net/biophilic-design-applications/ _zAccess to info
942			_2ddc _cCF _n0
999			_c1853 _d1853