000			02162nmm a22002657a 4500
003			ES-BaAUN
005			20230222115228.0
008			221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2575-5374
040			_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN
100			_aSevtsuk, Andres _d1981- _eauthor.
245			_aUrban Network Analysis: Tools for Modeling Pedestrian and Bicycle Trips in Cities
260	3		_burbanNext, _cDecember 11, 2018.
300			_b1369 words.
500			_aAndres Sevtsuk, Essay, expanding design practices, High Density, Territory and mobility, Urban Paradigms
501			_aAccessibility, Active Public Spaces, Analysis, Architect’s role, Bicycle, Built environment, City development, Comfortable environment, Cultural agitator, Demography, Density, Developing policies, Digital design, Essay, Infrastructure, Megacities & High Density, Mixed use, Mobility, Network, Pedestrian realm, Territorial Approach, Territory&Mobility, Transportation Systems, Urban design, Urban mobility, Urban research, Urban sprawl
504			_aExcerpt from Urban Network Analysis by the City Form Lab at Havard University GSD. A short introductory video about the UNA toolbox, as well as a few screen-recorded tutorials can be found online at: http://cityform.gsd.harvard.edu/projects/una-rhino-toolbox.
520			_aDesign of the built environment – the spatial arrangement of buildings, blocks, streets, public spaces and the socio-economic functions they house – produces a variety of influences on urban mobility patterns and mode choices. Sprawling developments, where destinations are far apart and routes between them wide and fast, incentivize motorized trips. High density, mixed-use environments, with diverse destinations connected through a network of quality sidewalks, incentivize walking, biking and face-to-face encounter. City form and land-use patterns influence whether, how often and along which paths people choose to walk.
653	0	0	_aUrban-network
653	0	0	_aPlanning
653	0	0	_aModeling
653	0	0	_aCities-trips
856	4	0	_uhttps://urbannext.net/urban-network-analysis/ _zAccess to info
942			_2ddc _cCF _n0
999			_c2033 _d2033