| 000 | 01751nmm a22002537a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-BaAUN | ||
| 005 | 20230224120055.0 | ||
| 008 | 221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2575-5374 | ||
| 040 |
_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aMalpas, Jeff _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | _aBuilding Memory: Ontology in Architecture | ||
| 260 | 3 |
_burbanNext, _cFebruary 01, 2019. |
|
| 300 | _b3690 words. | ||
| 500 | _aEssay, expanding design practices, Jeff Malpas, No Density, Territory and mobility | ||
| 501 | _aAccessibility, Architecture, Architecture’s challenge, Building, City, Collective identity, Contemporary architecture, Cultural agitator, Design, Essay, Ethics, Humanity, Identity, Memory, Power of materiality, Practice, Public engagement, Responsive Environment, Space-time relationship, Texture, Topography | ||
| 504 | _aThe following is an abridged version of an essay that first appeared in Interstices: Journal of Architecture and Related Arts 13 (2012), pp.11-21. | ||
| 520 | _aWhat is the ontology of architecture? One way to understand this question is to take it as asking after the basic elements of architectural practice. Another is to take the question as directed at the being of architecture, its proper limits and grounds. It is in this latter sense that I wish to put the question here. When taken in this sense, it seems there can be only one answer: more so than any other mode of human activity, architecture has its being in the human engagement with place, and more specifically, in the engagement with place as opened through building. | ||
| 653 | _aArchitecture | ||
| 653 | _aTheory | ||
| 653 | _aConcept | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://urbannext.net/building-memory/ _zAccess to info |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCF _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c2087 _d2087 |
||