| 000 | 01855nmm a22002777a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-BaAUN | ||
| 005 | 20230329111052.0 | ||
| 008 | 221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2575-5374 | ||
| 040 |
_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN |
||
| 110 | 2 |
_aNADAAA _earchitects. |
|
| 245 | _aMacallen Building: Housing Development | ||
| 260 | 3 |
_burbanNext, _cApril 13, 2020. |
|
| 300 | _a1106 words. | ||
| 500 | _aHigh Density, NADAAA, Project, Territory and mobility, Urban Paradigms | ||
| 501 | _aAlternative Domesticity, Architect’s role, Architecture, Boston, City development, Collaborative work, Community, Courtyard, Design process, Design strategies, Design-based research, Efficiency, Flexibility, Functional unit, Green roof, Greenery, Housing, Housing market, LEED, Lifecycle, material, Programmatic coexistences, Project, Public vs. Private, Rain Water Harvesting, Recycling, Renewable resources, Residential, Sustainable, Urban design, Urban landscape, USA | ||
| 504 | _aPhotography: John Horner | ||
| 520 | _aThe design of housing remains one of the least researched areas within the current debate in the United States – this despite a recent era of massive growth in the housing market. With the focus of development being in the suburbs, a good deal of building has fallen into the hands of developer/contractor alliances – and often without the agency of the architect. Meanwhile, much of the current work in the inner cities has been entrenched in the politics of compromise, negotiations with local communities and design review boards, coupled with the aesthetics of “simplistic” contextualism. | ||
| 653 | _aArchitecture | ||
| 653 | _aHousing design | ||
| 653 | _aProject | ||
| 653 | 5 | _aBoston, USA | |
| 653 | 5 | _aUSA | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://urbannext.net/macallen-building/ _zAccess to info |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCF _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c2541 _d2541 |
||