000			01956nmm a22002537a 4500
003			ES-BaAUN
005			20230807140606.0
008			221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2575-5374
040			_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN
100	1		_aMattsson, Helena _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aPomophobia and Feminism: Revisiting the Swedish Postmodern Discourse
260	3		_bUrbanNext, _cMarch 4, 2021.
300			_a6791 words.
500			_aArchitecture in Effect, Essay, expanding design practices, Helena Mattsson, No Density, Politics and economics
501			_aActivism, Architectural theory, Architecture, Architecture’s challenge, Architecture&Gender, Building regulations, Collective Awareness, Community, Consumption, Culture, Designing Strategies, Developing policies, Environmental, Essay, Global Awareness, History of Architecture, Identity, Ideology, Interaction, Mind Shift, Participation, Political & Economic Approach, Political implications, Post-modernism, Rethinking Urban Environments, Social cohesion, Social environment, Social Inclusion, Social process, Sweden, Urban Paradigms, Urban planning, Women
504			_aThis essay is an excerpt of Architecture in Effect vol. 1 edited by Sten Gromark, Jennifer Mack and Roemer van Toorn. Published by Actar Publishers.
520			_aIn his article “1980–2000: Pomofobi och uppsving,” the architect Thomas Hellquist (2001) argues that an avoidance of postmodernism, what he calls “pomophobia,” ruled the architectural establishment in the early years of the 1980s. This interpretation seems reasonable, as few practitioners would have called themselves postmodernists, but revisiting the period today, can we reframe the postmodern turn in Swedish architecture to broaden the picture?
653	0	0	_aArchitecture
653	0	0	_aGender
653	0	0	_aPost-modernism
856	4	0	_uhttps://urbannext.net/pomophobia-and-feminism/ _zAccess to info
942			_2ddc _cCF _n0
999			_c2711 _d2711