| 000 | 01891nmm a22002657a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-BaAUN | ||
| 005 | 20230831135218.0 | ||
| 008 | 221102| ||||go||d|||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2575-5374 | ||
| 040 |
_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPatteeuw, Véronique _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 0 | 1 | _aTopographic Architecture: Kenneth Frampton’s Interest in the Ground |
| 260 | 3 |
_burbanNext, _cApril 19, 2021. |
|
| 300 | _a2266 words. | ||
| 500 | _aBeing the Mountain, Designing Matter, Essay, Low Density, Territory and mobility, Véronique Patteeuw | ||
| 501 | _aAesthetics, Agriculture, Architecture, Architecture&nature, Concept, Context, Cultural legacy, Dealing with Nature, Earth, Environment, Essay, History of Architecture, Hybridization, Landscape, Local Awareness, Materials, Modernism, Natural materials, Swimming Pool, Technical systems, Tectonic grounds, Tectonics, Topography, Transformation, Vernacular | ||
| 504 | _aThis essay is an excerpt of Being The Mountain by PRODUCTORA, published by Actar Publishers and the Illinois Institute of Technology College of Architecture Press. | ||
| 504 | _aThis text was written in parallel to the preparation of “Critical Regionalism Revisited,” OASE 103, ed. Tom Avermaete, Véronique Patteeuw, Léa-Catherine Szacka, and Hans Teerds (2019). | ||
| 520 | _aAs such, Frampton aimed to rescue architecture from the many manipulations of history by providing it with a solid rootedness. But how did Frampton apprehend this rootedness? Was it essential to the architecture he promoted, a mere provocation against the so-called “presence of the past,” or a mechanism in his attempt to reposition architecture ideologically? | ||
| 653 | 0 | 0 | _aAgriculture |
| 653 | 0 | 0 | _aHistory of Architecture |
| 653 | 0 | 0 | _aVernacular |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://urbannext.net/topographic-architecture/ _zAccess to info |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCF _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c2731 _d2731 |
||