000			01961nmm a22003017a 4500
003			ES-BaAUN
005			20230914104033.0
008			221102b ||| |o||j| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2575-5374
040			_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN
100	1		_aEvitts Dickinson, Elizabeth _eauthor.
245	1	1	_aArchitecture, TRAP Laws, and the Battle Over Abortion
260	3		_burbanNext, _cAugust 3, 2020.
300			_a5607 words.
500			_aContributorsDensitiesElizabeth Evitts DickinsonEssayexpanding design practicesFormatsNo DensityPolitics and economicsTopics
501			_aArchitect’s role, Austin, Building, Building regulations, Design, Developing policies, Essay, Facilities, Health, Human rights, Political & Economic Approach, Political implications, Texas, USA, Well-being, Women
504			_aThis essay by Elizabeth Evitts Dickinson was previously published on Architect Magazine.
520			_aThanks to new codes and regulations for abortion clinics, the fight over a woman’s right to choose is now being waged in the built environment. If you ever visit a Whole Woman’s Health Clinic, part of a national chain of reproductive care facilities, you might notice that it doesn’t resemble a traditional health care space. Soothing lavender paint covers the walls and lamplight replaces harsh fluorescents. Diffusers steam calming essential oil, while a specially blended herbal tea, featuring peppermint for nausea and rose for cramping, steeps for patients. Exam rooms aren’t numbered; they’re named for inspirational women such as Frida Kahlo and Rosa Parks.
653			_aArchitect’s role
653			_aEssay
653			_aNo density
653			_aPolitics and economics
653	5		_aWell Being
700	1		_aAbiri, Hagar _eauthor.
710	2		_aAnd the City. _eauthor.
856	4	0	_uhttps://urbannext.net/architecture-trap-laws-and-the-battle-over-abortion/ _zAccess to info
942			_2ddc _cCF _n0
999			_c2803 _d2803