| 000 | 05465nmm a22004817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ES-BaAUN | ||
| 005 | 20230929083230.0 | ||
| 008 | 221102b ||| |o||j| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a2575-5374 | ||
| 040 |
_aES-BaAUN _beng _cES-BaAUN |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBurroughs, Brady _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 1 | _aArchitectural Flirtations, Formerly Known As Critique |
| 260 | 3 |
_burbanNext, _cJanuary 13, 2023. |
|
| 300 | _a4739 words. | ||
| 500 | _aBrady Burroughs, Contributors, Densities, Essay, expanding design practices, Formats, No Density, Politics and economics, Topics. | ||
| 501 | _aActivism, Architect's challenge, Architecture, Architecture&Gender, Building, Creativity, Education, Ephemeral, Essay, Interdisciplinarity, Knowledge, LGBTQ, On Discourse and Practices, Political implications, Research, Spatial practice. | ||
| 504 | _aThis essay has been originally published in Feminist Futures of Spatial Practice, edited by Meike Schalk, Thérèse Kristiansson, Ramia Mazé and published by AADR. | ||
| 504 | _aAhmed, Sara. 2006. “ORIENTATIONS: Toward A Queer Phenomenology.” GLQ: A Journal Of Lesbian And Gay Studies 12 (4): 543-574. | ||
| 504 | _aAhmed, Sara. 2014. Willful Subjects. Durham and London: Duke University Press. | ||
| 504 | _aAnonymous. 2002. “The Queer Nation Manifesto – NY pride march 1990.” In Queerfeministisk agenda [Queer Feminist Agenda]. Rosenberg, Tiina, 167-178. Stockholm: Atlas. | ||
| 504 | _a Bergman, David. 1993. “Strategic Camp.” In Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality, edited by David Bergman, 92-109. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. | ||
| 504 | _aBetsky, Aaron. 1997. Queer Space: Architecture and Same-Sex Desire. New York: William Morrow and Company. | ||
| 504 | _aBergström, Anders. 2014. “Architecture And The Rise Of Practice In Education.” Architectural Theory Review 19 (1): 10-21. | ||
| 504 | _aBourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. Richardson, 241-258. New York: Greenwood. | ||
| 504 | _a Butt, Gavin. 2006. “Scholarly Flirtations.” In A.C.A.D.E.M.Y., edited by Angelika Nollert et al., 187-192. Frankfurt am Main: Revolver Verlag. | ||
| 504 | _aCuff, Dana. 1991. “The Making of an Architect.” Chap. 4 in Architecture: The Story of Practice. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | ||
| 504 | _ahooks, bell. 2000. all about love: new visions. New York: Harper Perennial. | ||
| 504 | _a hooks, bell. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York and London: Routledge. | ||
| 504 | _aKnapp, Alex. 2012. “How George Takei Conquered Facebook.” Forbes, March 23. Accessed April 28, 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/03/23/how-george-takei-conquered-facebook/. | ||
| 504 | _aPhillips, Adam. 1994. On Flirtation: Psychoanalytic Essays on the Uncommitted Life. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. | ||
| 504 | _aRendell, Jane. 2011. “Critical Spatial Practices: Setting Out a Feminist Approach to some Modes and what Matters in Architecture,” In Feminist Practices: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Women in Architecture, edited by Lori Brown, 17-55. Surrey, UK: Ashgate. | ||
| 504 | _aSedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You.” Chap. 4 in Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham & London: Duke University Press. | ||
| 504 | _aSontag, Susan. (1964) 1986. “Notes On ‘Camp’.” In Against Interpretation. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Auckland: Anchor Books Doubleday. | ||
| 504 | _aWebster, Helena. 2007. ‟The Analytics of Power: Re-presenting the Design Jury.” Journal Of Architectural Education 60 (3): 21-27. | ||
| 520 | _aIn this chapter, I aim to briefly describe and position the key concepts that form the central idea of my recently published dissertation Architectural Flirtations: A Love Storey. I explore the terms architectural, flirtations and critique, in relation to ideas about architects and their formation, staked out by architect and theorist, Dana Cuff in her chapter “The Making of an Architect” from 1991.[1] Cuff writes: “The ethos of a profession is born in schools.”[2] For me, it’s obvious that the effects are lasting! Although written almost 25 years ago, around the time of my own design education, I am struck by the degree to which my masters architecture students still recognize elements of their own education in Cuff’s text when reading it together in March 2014.[3] In revisiting the central aspects that contribute to making a culture of architects, what Cuff describes as enculturation, “a process that transforms layperson into architect through the knowledge, experience, and authority gained over the course of a career,” with a specific focus on education, I propose an intentional and continuous displacing of what I call the center. [4] This strategy, what I call architectural flirtations, involves clearing ground for more ethical, socially conscious, and generous architectural conversations. | ||
| 653 | _aexpanding design practices | ||
| 653 | _aPolitics and economics | ||
| 653 | _aNo density | ||
| 653 | _aInterdisciplinarity | ||
| 653 | _aArchitecture&Gender | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://urbannext.net/architectural-flirtations-formerly-known-as-critique/ _zAccess to info |
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCF _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c2977 _d2977 |
||